DIO Implant vs Hiossen (Osstem): Which Budget Korean Implant Wins?

DIO Implant and Hiossen (Osstem's US brand) are two of the most affordable FDA-approved dental implants available in America. At $850 and $900 respectively, they make dental implants accessible to patients who previously couldn't afford treatment.

DIO Implant (Busan, South Korea) uses a unique RBM (Resorbable Blast Media) calcium phosphate surface that has shown strong results in clinical studies. Their UF(II) implant features self-tapping threads designed for excellent primary stability even in softer bone types.

Hiossen (Osstem) is the larger operation — the world's #4 implant manufacturer by volume. The SA (Sand-blasted, Acid-etched) surface is their standard, and the TS/ETIII lines offer a proven track record across millions of placed implants worldwide.

At just $50 apart, price isn't the deciding factor. The real differentiators are your dentist's training, the available prosthetic components, and the specific implant design best suited to your bone type.

Advertisement

Key Differences at a Glance

Cost Difference $50
DIO Implant $850 Budget
Hiossen (Osstem) $900 Budget

Full Specification Comparison

Specification DIO Implant Hiossen (Osstem)
Average Cost per Implant $850 $900
Clinical Success Rate 96.5% 96.5%
Tier Budget Budget
Origin South Korea USA / South Korea
Material Type Grade 4 Titanium Grade 4 Titanium
Surface Technology UV Active® SA (Sand-blasted, Acid-etched)
FDA Approval FDA 510(k) Cleared since 2008 — DIO Implant System, UV Active System FDA 510(k) Cleared — ET III and TSIII implant systems
Warranty 10 Years 10 Years
Year Founded 2000 1997
Headquarters Busan, South Korea Branchburg, New Jersey, USA (Parent: Osstem Implant, Seoul, South Korea)
Advertisement

Technology Comparison

DIO Implant Technology

Surface: UV Active® — UV light-activated super-hydrophilic surface

Material: Grade 4 Titanium

Prosthetics: Internal hex, Cement-retained, Screw-retained, DIOnavi guided surgery, Overdenture

Hiossen (Osstem) Technology

Surface: SA (Sand-blasted, Acid-etched) — Resorbable media blasting

Material: Grade 4 Titanium

Prosthetics: Cement-retained, Screw-retained, Overdenture, Multi-unit

Who Is Each Brand Best For?

DIO Implant

Budget-conscious patients wanting FDA-approved implants, dental tourism patients in Korea and Southeast Asia, clinicians seeking a complete digital surgery workflow at accessible pricing, and cases where UV-activated surface technology can benefit patients with compromised healing.

Hiossen (Osstem)

Budget-conscious patients who need reliable, FDA-approved dental implants, patients in dental networks and DSOs (dental service organizations) offering competitive pricing, those with adequate bone and straightforward cases who prioritize affordability, and patients who cannot access premium brands due to cost constraints.

Our Verdict

Choose DIO Implant if you want the absolute lowest cost for an FDA-approved implant, your dentist is DIO-certified, or the RBM calcium phosphate surface appeals to your clinician. Choose Hiossen (Osstem) if you want the backing of a larger manufacturer, broader prosthetic options, and more extensive clinical data from the world's #4 implant company.

Read Full Reviews

Related Comparisons

Explore More

Advertisement

Frequently Asked Questions

Is DIO Implant as safe as Hiossen?
Yes. Both are FDA 510(k) approved, made from medical-grade titanium, and meet ISO 13485 quality management standards. DIO Implant reports success rates above 96.5%, while Hiossen reports above 97%. Both are safe, clinically proven options.
Which is more widely used in the US, DIO or Hiossen?
Hiossen (Osstem) has significantly larger US market share due to earlier entry, aggressive DSO partnerships, and a broader distribution network. DIO Implant is growing but has a smaller US footprint, especially outside major metropolitan dental markets.
Are there any clinical situations where DIO is better than Hiossen?
DIO's UF(II) implant with aggressive self-tapping threads may offer advantages in softer bone (Type III-IV) where primary stability is challenging. For standard bone types, clinical outcomes between the two systems are comparable.
How do DIO and Hiossen compare to premium European brands?
Both are excellent value alternatives. For straightforward cases with adequate bone, studies show comparable success rates to premium brands. The trade-off is fewer prosthetic options, less long-term longitudinal data, and no access to proprietary materials like Straumann's Roxolid alloy.
Reviewed by Kevin Luo Health Data Researcher
Advertisement