Hiossen (Osstem) vs MIS Implants: Budget vs Mid-Range — $200 Apart
Hiossen (Osstem) and MIS Implants represent the boundary between budget and mid-range implant pricing. At $200 apart ($900 vs $1,100), patients often wonder whether the step up from Korean budget to Israeli mid-range delivers meaningful clinical benefit.
Hiossen (Osstem) leads on volume — the world's #4 manufacturer with over 10 million implants produced annually. The SA surface is a proven workhorse, and the TS/ETIII implant lines handle most routine cases reliably. Hiossen's scale means excellent availability and competitive pricing.
MIS Implants leads on surface science — the B+ nanostructured calcium phosphate surface represents a meaningful advancement over standard SLA/SA surfaces. MIS also offers the MGUIDE digital planning platform and is now part of Dentsply Sirona, giving it access to one of the largest dental ecosystems globally.
The $200 question: does MIS's advanced surface and digital workflow justify the modest premium over Hiossen's battle-tested simplicity?
Key Differences at a Glance
Full Specification Comparison
| Specification | Hiossen (Osstem) | MIS Implants |
|---|---|---|
| Average Cost per Implant | $900 | $1,100 |
| Clinical Success Rate | 96.5% | 97.0% |
| Tier | Budget | Mid-Range |
| Origin | USA / South Korea | Israel |
| Material Type | Grade 4 Titanium | Grade 4 / Grade 5 Titanium (Ti-6Al-4V) |
| Surface Technology | SA (Sand-blasted, Acid-etched) | B+ Surface |
| FDA Approval | FDA 510(k) Cleared — ET III and TSIII implant systems | FDA 510(k) Cleared — V3, C1, Seven, and M4 implant systems |
| Warranty | 10 Years | Lifetime |
| Year Founded | 1997 | 1995 |
| Headquarters | Branchburg, New Jersey, USA (Parent: Osstem Implant, Seoul, South Korea) | Shlomi, Israel (Dentsply Sirona) |
Technology Comparison
Hiossen (Osstem) Technology
Surface: SA (Sand-blasted, Acid-etched) — Resorbable media blasting
Material: Grade 4 Titanium
Prosthetics: Cement-retained, Screw-retained, Overdenture, Multi-unit
MIS Implants Technology
Surface: B+ Surface — Sand-blasted & acid-etched with nanometer calcium phosphate
Material: Grade 4 / Grade 5 Titanium (Ti-6Al-4V)
Prosthetics: Cement-retained, Screw-retained, MGUIDE digital workflow, Overdenture
Who Is Each Brand Best For?
Hiossen (Osstem)
Budget-conscious patients who need reliable, FDA-approved dental implants, patients in dental networks and DSOs (dental service organizations) offering competitive pricing, those with adequate bone and straightforward cases who prioritize affordability, and patients who cannot access premium brands due to cost constraints.
MIS Implants
Price-sensitive patients who want a well-established implant brand with extensive clinical data, clinicians seeking a versatile system for both simple and moderately complex cases, and practices looking for a strong digital workflow integration through the MGUIDE platform.
Our Verdict
Choose Hiossen (Osstem) if your priority is cost savings, your dentist already uses the Osstem system, or you have a straightforward case where the SA surface is sufficient. Choose MIS Implants if you want the enhanced B+ surface technology, value digital planning (MGUIDE), or prefer a brand backed by Dentsply Sirona's global support network.